Home > Corruption, Papua New Guinea > Will Prime Minister O’Neill crumble before NEC opponents over Manumanu COI?

Will Prime Minister O’Neill crumble before NEC opponents over Manumanu COI?

pok-and-duma

When evidence was made public on 1 February this year, linking the State Enterprises Minister, Defence Minister and Chair of the Central Supply and Tender Board, to a major land swindle, Prime Minister O’Neill swiftly announced a Commission of Inquiry.  

He appeared to have his ducks lined up. The ABC reported just five days later that a retired judge was to be appointed head of the COI. 

Two names were thrown around in the social media, Warwick Andrews and Graham Ellis.

Odds are it was the latter who had been approached by O’Neill. 

After all, Ellis had previously been asked by the NEC to Chair the Interim Anti-Corruption Office. However, this appointment has been blocked by a court injunction, which wont be heard until April. 

This has left Ellis in limbo. Cue the role as head of the Commission of Inquiry.

However, evidence coming from within the NEC indicates that Minister for Public Services, Puka Temu, among others, have deep reservations over O’Neill’s choice.

If the appointment is Ellis, this makes sense.

When he was a National Court Judge from 1990-1992, and 2009-2011, he had a reputation for effectively clearing out case backlogs and swiftly getting the wheels of justice into gear. The Poreporena Freeway Commission of Inquiry he chaired in 1992 was completed within 8 weeks and under budget. He also Chaired a 1991 Leadership Tribunal that led to the famous resignation of Ted Diro.

For a Minister such as Puka Temu, whose own connections with William Duma’s sticky fingers, has been documented by the National Court – the news that a no-nonsense judge, with a reputation of being fiercely independent, may not have come as welcomed news. 

It is not clear how the struggle within NEC will turn out. But it stands to reason if the retired Judge already appointed to head the country’s premiere anti-corruption office is selected, it is a sign that substance has trumped expediency. On the other hand, if we see hands ruffle down to the bottom of the barrel, we can safely assume a certain Prime Minister is being held over it – and is prepared to set up a COI, that will be little more than a whitewash.

Advertisements
  1. Hamish Nelson Kairi
    March 1, 2017 at 1:32 pm

    Great stuff guys – I wonder if mainstream Journalists are looking at this.

    On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 1:17 PM, PNGexposed Blog wrote:

    > pngexposed posted: ” When evidence was made public on 1 February this > year, linking the State Enterprises Minister, Defence Minister and Chair of > the Central Supply and Tender Board, to a major land swindle, Prime > Minister O’Neill swiftly announced a Commission of Inquiry. ” >

  2. Skius
    March 2, 2017 at 11:54 am

    Seriously, this is your read? Are you even in PNG? You seriously need better sources.

    • March 3, 2017 at 3:47 am

      So what is your read? Why the delay in the CoI?

  3. Joseph Lelegi
    March 3, 2017 at 6:47 pm

    Seems that Ano Palacrescued the PM?

  4. W.self
    March 7, 2017 at 9:52 pm

    There will be no COI – instead am “administrative inquiry”
    whatever that means.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: