Home > Corruption, Papua New Guinea > Paraka Lawyers challenges legality of Task Force Sweep

Paraka Lawyers challenges legality of Task Force Sweep

From Radio New Zealand

Papua New Guinea’s National Court is expected to decide on Thursday whether to hear several applications by Paul Paraka Lawyers to stop the anti-corruption team Task Force Sweep from carrying out investigations into the law firm.

In one of several high-profile investigations it is conducting, Task Force Sweep is probing allegations that the law firm received illegal payments from the Finance Department.

Johnny Blades asked our correspondent Todagia Kelola about the action by Paul Paraka lawyers.

TODAGIA KELOLA: Mr Paraka has gone to court to try to question the powers of the Task Force Sweep team, alleging that the manner in which the task force team is operating is not in line with the constitution. It’s unlawful and contrary to the purposes that the National Executive Council made in appointing them to carry out this task. Yesterday was this argument basically whether the court will allow Mr Paraka’s application to be fully aired in the national court. So when they went to court, Ian Molloy, who is acting on behalf of Mr Paraka, submitted in court, questioning the conduct of the Sweep team and the manner in which they were their operations inside were established. Mr Molloy submitted that the conduct of the Sweep team could be unlawful and contrary to its purposes as it has been interfering with the work of police and other statutory bodies. He also submitted that the Sweep team was not set up through the formal legislation process, but through a decision by the National Executive Council.

JOHNNY BLADES: So is there a bit of a grey area over this that the police link within Task Force Sweep’s work?

TODAGIA KELOLA: Yes, that’s basically what Mr Paraka’s lawyers are arguing through the courts. Molloy also stated that the chairman, Sam Cohen, has been leading and giving direction to police officers, which is like interfering with the work of police. A police officer has his own constitutional powers and he reports to the police commissioner and no-one else. But in this case Mr Paraka is alleging that Mr Cohen is acting like a police commissioner by giving directions and instructions to police officers which are not established through the legislative processes.

JOHNNY BLADES: How far through is the investigation of Paraka Lawyers?

TODAGIA KELOLA: The investigations are still in the preliminary stages. Task Force Sweep has got some search warrants from the national court to obtain Mr Paraka’s bank accounts for their investigations. It’s still in its preliminary stages.

Meanwhile, the lawyer for Task Force Sweep says the National Executive Council appointed the team as a multi-agency organisation, comprising professionals from various agencies who are engaged to carry out investigations in the fight against corruption in the country.

  1. Mande Seng
    October 21, 2013 at 4:34 pm

    The money was paid for service rendered..fair enough and Peter Oniel and James Marape approved the payments. Thay should be equally blamed for the blunder. Finance Secretary and his Deputy became the scapegoat when Peter Oniel, again denied authorising the payments claiming his signature was forged.. What a joke for PM. All educated PNGeans are watching. Hang all of them. Rich are richer and Poor are getting Poorer. Contracts are now being awarded only to those who are related to Peter Oniel and his cohorts.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: